Polkadot Competitive Research Proposal
· 5 min read
Goals
Look deeply into the technical abilities and developer experiences provided by other Blockchain and Web3 ecosystems, and bring back learnings, features, and facts to the Polkadot ecosystem.
Funding Process
Listed below is a set of phases and deliverables for competitive research.
Each item can be funded and delivered separately, and further phases can be added on as needed.
A retainer (or bounty) should be allocated to show intent of funding future work.
Then, the expected output can be agreed upon:
- Which protocol(s)?
- What phases and deliverables?
An estimate will be generated:
- How much time (in days) is estimated to complete this work?
- What timeline should the work be completed by?
- What check-points (if any) can be used to check the progress of the work?
If everyone is satisfied with the work and output, more funding can be allocated and the process can repeat.
Phases
Research
Let's look to understand what other protocol teams are trying to build and provide to the Web3 ecosystem.
Work
- Determine the key product they are trying to create.
- Where does it fit into the Web3 space?
- What challenges are they trying to tackle?
- Identify the best video (or set of) that explains their technical product.
- Identify best source of documentation for technical implementation and design decisions.
Output
- Written report of the protocol
- Their product space / mindshare
- Key technical advantages / innovations
- Technical disadvantages / tradeoffs
Example
- What are the different kinds of bridges, and their tradeoffs?
- Compare protocols
- Compare technical design
- Compare strengths / weaknesses
- Compare "unsolved problems"